Brassica plants contain important secondary metabolites, such as glucosinolates, and provide a nutritious addition to the human diet. Glucosinolates, when hydrolyzed, yield isothiocyanates which can affect the carcinogenesis process, and further research into increasing glucosinolate concentrations in plants is important for determining anticarcinogenic properties of brassicas in human diets. Kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala cv. ‘Toscano’ ) and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana, Col-0) were grown in the greenhouse under natural light (control) and subjected to three additional supplemental light treatments to determine the impact of supplemental LED lighting on glucosinolate concentrations. Treatments included no supplemental light (control), 75:25 Red:Blue LED, 50:50 Red:Blue LED, and Warm White LED light at 100 μmol.m-2.s-1 each. Plants were harvested when the first kale treatment group reached a leaf number of 7, and when half of all Arabidopsis flowers began opening. Harvested plants were analyzed for glucosinolate and mineral nutrient concentration. Statistical analysis on Arabidopsis data revealed significant differences among light treatments in glucosinolate concentrations, particularly glucoraphanin and gluconasturtiin. Additionally, significant differences were found in leaf and petiole mass and leaf number of both kale and Arabidopsis at harvest. The no supplemental light control produced the lowest harvest mass compared to plants receiving supplemental light. Preliminary qPCR analysis of Arabidopsis displays variations in the relative expression of genes CYP79B2 and CYP83A1, varying across treatment when compared to the control. Glucosinolate analysis of kale resulted in no statistically significant differences among all four light treatments. However, glucosinolates, including gluconapin, glucoraphanin, gluconasturtiin, and several unknowns, were found to be present across all four treatments. As glucosinolates are stress-response compounds, their lack of variation in kale and significant variation in Arabidopsis under different light environments indicate that other environmental factors also play a crucial role in their production. Further research is necessary to identify abiotic and biotic factors influencing their concentration in the greenhouse environment for both species.
