Much scientific literature refers to plant development and growth as though they are synonymous. While plant physiology texts (E.g., Taiz et al. 2015) and horticulture texts (E.g., Sansavini et al. 2019) emphasize the roles of various plant hormones in coordinating plant development, they simultaneously refer to them as plant growth regulators. On the other hand, the same texts emphasize assimilation processes and the important role of carbohydrate and nutrient availability as well as water relations in enabling growth to occur. The terms growth and development are often used interchangeably and the literature rarely emphasizes the difference between plant development and plant growth. This causes confusion and a lack of clear thinking when attempting to develop explanations for plant growth responses in specific circumstances. Hormone physiologists often try to explain particular growth responses in terms of hormonal theory whereas environmental physiologists will likely explain the same responses in terms of environmental conditions and availability for the resources required for achieving growth. In this paper I will argue for a clearer differentiation between plant development and plant growth and suggest that plant hormones should not be thought of as plant growth regulators, but rather as plant development coordinators. Plant development coordinators (plant hormones) set up the conditions necessary for plant growth but availability of plant growth substances; carbohydrate and nutrient availability along with temperature and water relations, are often what actually regulate plant growth rates. Treating development and growth as separate but interdependent processes could clarify much understanding of the underlying processes involved in the regulation of plant growth. These concepts will be discussed in the context of understanding the mechanisms involved in several physiological phenomenon of fruit trees.
