There has long been demand from the Master Gardener population for approved continuing education credit for reading specific literature. This program aims to fill that gap while defining a clear scope of acceptable reading material and demonstrable learning. A quarterly suite of reading materials was made available to program participants through email. Participants have one quarter (3 months) to read the materials and complete a quiz through Qualtrics. Participants who successfully completed the quarter were awarded one hour of continuing education toward their annually required minimum. Results from the first quarter of the study indicate positive change in knowledge across all areas surveyed from pre- to post-. For the first topic, tree care and planting, participants were asked to rank their knowledge about proper planting techniques, factors affecting decline in trees, selecting appropriate planting sites, identifying tree problems, and managing storm damage to trees. In all areas, at least a few participants reported not being knowledgeable at all prior to completing the educational materials. When asked about their knowledge after completing the materials, no participants reported this level of lack of knowledge. The greatest improvements were seen in the areas of knowledge about identifying tree problems and managing storm damage to trees. When asked about knowledge of managing storm damage to trees prior to completing the educational materials, 43.6% reported being not at all knowledgeable, 30.8% reported being slightly knowledgeable, 23.1% reported being moderately knowledgeable, and 2.6% reported being very knowledgeable. After completing the materials, 12.8% reported being slightly knowledgeable, 48.7% reported being moderately knowledgeable, 33.3% reported being very knowledgeable, and 5.1% reported being extremely knowledgeable. The assessment also included open-ended questions that asked participants to envision how they would put the knowledge to use in their volunteer roles. More research is needed to determine if knowledge gained from literature review is both worthwhile and feasible for volunteer development and continuing education. The study is being conducted over the course of a year, with participants able to opt out of any quarter they do not feel inclined to participate in. First quarter results show high participation and high knowledge gain, but more information is needed to see if engagement and knowledge gain remain high after the initial novelty period has worn off.
