Light quality plays a crucial role in the growth and development of plants. In this study, we aimed to assess the effects of short-wavelength light on rose genotype '16401-N055’, which exhibits the flower color transitioning trait: the flowers change colors from yellow to pink in sunlight. Roses that exhibit this flower phenotype are termed transitioning-type roses. Specifically, we analyzed and compared the impact of six different light treatments [a sunlight control in open field and five spectral treatments created using light-emitting diodes (LEDs)] on various physiological and morphological characteristics. The five LED treatments included white light, blue light, UV-A white light, UV-B white light, and 80% blue 20% white light. Each treatment had two replications where one-year-old rose plants were the experimental unit. The total light intensity was maintained at 300-350 micromol m-2 s-1 for a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h darkness. The morphological traits measured included height, width, number of buds, number of flowers, and node density. The color scale parameters L* [luminance of the color ranging from 0 (black) to 100 (white)], a* [red (positive values) and green (negative values) color levels], and b* [yellow (positive values) and blue (negative values) color levels] were measured using a colorimeter. Additionally, the chlorophyll concentration index (CCI) was measured using a chlorophyll meter. Fully pigmented pink flowers were only observed in the UV-B white light treatment with an average L* value of 44.1 and a* value of 50.6. A slight pink hue was observed on the outer sections of petals in blue and blue white light treatments. The average L* and a* values of flowers in the blue treatment were 87.21 and 6.24, and in blue white treatment were 90.9 and 1.86, respectively. The flowers in the white UV-A treatment remained white with the highest average L* value of 92.4 and the lowest average a* value of -1.86. The CCI of plants under sunlight (23.5) was significantly lower than the plants treated with blue (34.4), and blue white (33.7) light. No significant differences in morphological traits were detected after two weeks. The plants will be monitored for longer periods and more data will be collected every two weeks for one month to document additional changes. The results obtained will provide additional information on morphological and floral changes in this genotype under different light treatments.
